"If Mozart had patented the symphony, what would Beethoven have done?"
— A software exec decries looming European legislation that would grant broad patents on code.
I'm just guessing here, but I believe he would pay royalties to the patent holder. Not that I'm defending software patents, but a symphony patent wouldn't have necessarily stopped symphony writing, it would merely have required the payment of royalties to the patent holder. Also since Mozart wrote his first Symphony in 1772, the patent would have expired before Beethoven wrote his first in 1800. This really isn't a very good argument against software patents.